How to answer Legal Studies Section II Part A short answers remains one of the biggest unresolved mysteries of the HSC.
Of course, many other HSC subjects have short answer responses. But funnily enough, how to respond to them with those subjects is also outlined clearly and taught in class.
That being said, I have yet to meet anyone who has been properly instructed on how to answer short answers in Legal.
So in a bid to save you all from unnecessary cortisol-overdrive, this is article will demonstrate, step by step, how to absolutely slay Short Answer for HSC Legal Studies. I’ll be using the latest HSC 2015 Legal Studies Exam Paper to do so, and the official marking criteria as the example responses to break it all down.
“Explain how the Australian Human Rights Commission OR another independent statutory authority promotes human rights.”
Explain how: you will need to outline the processes and methods of either the AHRC or another independent statutory authority
Promotes human rights: you need to link these processes to the promotion of human rights
The mark of each question is a good indication of how much to write. Students tend to write too much for short response questions. Save the time for your essays!
There is no real structure for 2-3 mark questions, and can be answered in 2-4 sentences. The longer does not mean the better. All that is required is you hit the two key points we highlighted above.
In this question, I would list 2-3 processes of the AHRC or another independent statutory authority, and link each one to the promotion of human rights.
- Example of a process
- How that is related to human rights
The example question does this twice. This is sufficient. But to be on the safe side, I always recommend to give 3 examples for 3 marks if you can think of another. It is always preferable to veer on the safe side, in case one of your examples aren’t spot on.
“Outline the role of law reform in the abolition of slavery.”
Outline: explaining the process of law reform which the abolition of slavery has seen in the past
Abolition of slavery: how that has affected slavery abolition
5-6 mark questions should have an argument, or ‘point of view’. Therefore, you need to think of your position on the statement. How has law reform affected the abolition of slavery? Did it assist the abolition of slavery? Hinder it? Had no effect?
After establishing your argument, you will need to provide examples or real-life cases which support your point of view. Unlike English, there is no structure to integrate these examples in your response. With Legal Studies, the focus is more on your knowledge of the legal world rather than your command of essay-writing.
In terms of length, it should generally be the length of the spaces provided. However, the size of writing differs. So a rough word count should be 150-2oo words.
Try it! Give this question a try! Give yourself a rating of 1 – 3 (1 being terribly, and 3 being you slayed it) of how well you addressed the following in your answer.
- Have you got a strong position statement?
- Have you identified what legal reform occured?
- Have you identified an actual case?
- Does this case prove that the reform assisted in the abolition of slavery?
- Have you provided an assesment of how effective the reform was?
Mostly three’s? You’re doing well 🙂 Mostly one’s? Keep practicing!
The first green sentence is the argument. This doesn’t have to be English-essay level specific. Just your general answer to the question, in one sentence. Usually, of a ‘yes or no’ nature. In this case, we have a ‘yes’ response – an affirmation of the effectiveness of law reform.
All the blue are examples given. For a 5 mark question, here there are 5/6 responses (depending on if we count the last two conventions as one example). This is a good number to include.
The purple underlines the explanatory parts. As you can see in the example, each of the examples (blue) are supplemented by an explanation (purple).
The purple describes the link between the historical events (blue) and the eventual abolition of slavery. They explain the relation between these examples of law reform and slavery abolition. This is clear when we read into what the purple describes: “changing social values”, “worldwide movement”, “changing community standards” and “ratification”.
The last green sentence makes a short comment on slavery today. This isn’t entirely necessary, but ties together this longer short response.
I want to add a caveat here and say that the short answer part of Legal Studies HSC papers have been the same structure for the past few years. However, no one can guarantee that this exact same structure will be used in the years to come – so the most important parts to absorb is:
- How to ‘break-down’ a question
- The correlation between the marks for a question and how much to write
- Structuring your responses
- How to use evidence, and the frequency of using evidence
I hope that cleared up Legal Studies short answers for you!
Looking for some extra help with your HSC Legal Studies?
We pride ourselves on our inspirational HSC coaches and mentors!
We offer tutoring and mentoring for Years K-12 in a variety of subjects, with personalised lessons conducted one-on-one in your home or at our state of the art campus in Hornsby!
To find out more and get started with an inspirational tutor and mentor get in touch today!
Give us a ring on 1300 267 888, email us at email@example.com or check us out on Facebook!
Sophia Zou recently completed the HSC in 2013, so fortunately for AOS Community Blog-readers and perhaps less fortunately for her, the memories of Year 12 are still fresh in her head. Sophia considers it her mission here to help students make the most of their final years at high school. Her interests include political science, Simon and Garfunkel, and pretending to be a tea aficionado. Alongside tutoring at Art of Smart Education, she spends her time playing the piano and studying Government & IR and Languages at the University of Sydney.